Red and processed meat consumption and risk of bladder cancer [Elektronisk resurs] a dose-response meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

• BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several epidemiological studies have analyzed the associations between red and processed meat and bladder cancer risk but the shape and strength of the associations are still unclear. Therefore, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to quantify the potential association between red and processed meat and bladder cancer risk. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching the PubMed database through January 2016 and reviewing the reference lists of the retrieved articles. Results were combined using random-effects models. RESULTS: Five cohort studies with 3262 cases and 1,038,787 participants and 8 cases-control studies with 7009 cases and 27,240 participants met the inclusion criteria. Red meat was linearly associated with bladder cancer risk in case-control studies, with a pooled RR of 1.51 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13, 2.02) for every 100 g increase per day, while no association was observed among cohort studies (P heterogeneity across study design = 0.02). Based on both case-control and cohort studies, the pooled relative risk (RR) for every 50 g increase of processed meat per day was 1.20 (95% CI 1.06, 1.37) (P heterogeneity across study design = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that processed meat may be positively associated with bladder cancer risk. A positive association between red meat and risk of bladder cancer was observed only in case-control studies, while no association was observe in prospective studies. 

Ämnesord

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)

Clinical Medicine  (hsv)

Cancer and Oncology  (hsv)

Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)

Klinisk medicin  (hsv)

Cancer och onkologi  (hsv)

Genre

government publication  (marcgt)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Bladder cancer

Dose–response

Meta-analysis

Processed meat

Red meat