Startsida
Hjälp
Sök i LIBRIS databas

     

 

Sökning: onr:t7n2hrb6r2jnnbrr > Classification syst...

Classification systems of cleft lip, alveolus and palate [Elektronisk resurs] results of an international survey

Houkes, Ruben (författare)
Smit, Johannes (författare)
Mossey, Peter (författare)
Don Griot, Peter (författare)
Persson, Martin, 1971- (författare)
Neville, Amanda (författare)
Ongkosuwito, Edwin (författare)
Sitzman, Tom (författare)
Breugem, Corstiaan (författare)
Högskolan Kristianstad Fakulteten för hälsovetenskap (utgivare)
Högskolan Kristianstad Fakulteten för hälsovetenskap (utgivare)
Publicerad: 2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. - 1055-6656. ; 1-8
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
  • E-artikel/E-kapitel
Sammanfattning Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective : This study aimed to identify commonly used classification systems by cleft providers around the world, including the perceived indications and limitations of each system. Design : A cross-sectional survey. Participants : A total of 197 registrants from three international cleft/craniofacial meetings. Interventions : Participants were sent a web-based questionnaire concerning cleft classification systems. Main outcome measures : Frequency of commonly used classification systems, their perceived indications and limitations. Results : A total of 197 respondents from 166 different centers completed the questionnaire. Healthcare professionals from all disciplines responded, with the most frequent respondents being plastic surgeons (38.1%), maxillofacial surgeons (28.4%) and orthodontists (23.9%). Eighteen different classification systems were in use. The most frequently used systems were the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) (35.5%), LAHSHAL (34.0%), and Veau (32.5%) classification systems. Most respondents (32.5%) indicated that anatomical and morphological characteristics are essential components of a classification system. However, respondents indicated that their current classification systems lacked sufficient description of cleft extension and severity. Conclusions : Great variety in the use of classification systems exists among craniofacial specialists internationally. The results recommend the usage of the LAHSHAL classification of OFCs, due to its comprehensiveness, relatively high implementation rate globally, convenience of usage and complementarity with the ICD-10 system. Moreover, it can overcome deficiencies inextricably linked to ICD-10, such as incapacity to describe laterality and clefts of the alveolus. More international exposure to the merits of using the LAHSHAL classification system would be highly recommended. 

Ämnesord

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Otorhinolaryngology  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Oto-rino-laryngologi  (hsv)
Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Surgery  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Kirurgi  (hsv)

Genre

government publication  (marcgt)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Classification system
cleft lip
cleft palate
orofacial cleft
survey
Inställningar Hjälp

Ingår i annan publikation. Gå till titeln The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Om LIBRIS
Sekretess
Hjälp
Fel i posten?
Kontakt
Teknik och format
Sök utifrån
Sökrutor
Plug-ins
Bookmarklet
Anpassa
Textstorlek
Kontrast
Vyer
LIBRIS söktjänster
SwePub
Uppsök

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy