Startsida
Hjälp
Sök i LIBRIS databas

     

 

Sökning: onr:n1djdk16lfvvm3g2 > Documenting informa...

Documenting information making in archaeological field reports [Elektronisk resurs]

Huvila, Isto, 1976- (författare)
Sköld, Olle, 1983- (författare)
Börjesson, Lisa, 1985- (författare)
Uppsala universitet Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet (utgivare)
Publicerad: 2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Documentation. - 0022-0418.
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
Läs hela texten
  • E-artikel/E-kapitel
Sammanfattning Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: Sharing information about work processes has proven to be difficult. This applies especially to information shared from those who participate in a process to those who remain outsiders. The purpose of this article is to increase understanding of how professionals document their work practices with a focus on information making by analysing how archaeologists document their information work in archaeological reports. Design/methodology/approach: 47 Swedish archaeological reports published in 2018 were analysed using close reading and constant comparative categorisation. Findings: Even if explicit narratives of methods and work process have particular significance as documentation of information making, the evidence of information making is spread out all over the report document in 1) procedural narratives, 2) descriptions of methods and tools, 3) actors and actants, 4) photographs, 5) information sources, 6) diagrams and drawings, and 7) outcomes. The usability of reports as conveyors of information on information making depends more on how a forthcoming reader can live with it as a whole rather than how to learn of the details it recites. Originality: There is little earlier research on how professionals and academics document and describe their information activities.Research limitations/implications: The study is based on a limited number of documents representing one country and one scholarly and professional field. Practical implications: Increased focus on the internal coherence of documentation and the complementarity of different types of descriptions could improve information sharing. Further, descriptions of concepts that refer to work activities and the situation when information came into being could similarly improve their usability. 

Ämnesord

Social Sciences  (hsv)
Media and Communications  (hsv)
Information Studies  (hsv)
Samhällsvetenskap  (hsv)
Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap  (hsv)
Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap  (hsv)
Humanities and the Arts  (hsv)
History and Archaeology  (hsv)
Archaeology  (hsv)
Humaniora och konst  (hsv)
Historia och arkeologi  (hsv)
Arkeologi  (hsv)
Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap  (uu)
Library and Information Science  (uu)
Archaeology  (uu)
Arkeologi  (uu)

Genre

government publication  (marcgt)

Indexterm och SAB-rubrik

Documentation
work practices
information making
information creation
Archaeology
reports
scholarly practices
Inställningar Hjälp

Ingår i annan publikation. Gå till titeln Journal of Documentation

Om LIBRIS
Sekretess
Hjälp
Fel i posten?
Kontakt
Teknik och format
Sök utifrån
Sökrutor
Plug-ins
Bookmarklet
Anpassa
Textstorlek
Kontrast
Vyer
LIBRIS söktjänster
SwePub
Uppsök

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

Copyright © LIBRIS - Nationella bibliotekssystem

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy